Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 70/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 71/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
218K
188K
Completed sessions
2,601,380
1,835,562
Token share
0.19%
0.12%
Tokens
2.6T+126%
1.6T+100%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.2%9.7K user-weeks
64.2%5.1K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba Mini