Compare AI models: GPT-5 Nano vs Grok 4.7
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 76/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
400K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.40/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
7.4K
75K
Completed sessions
56,157
187,193
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
5B+16%
91B+100%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Nano·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini